About Me
Enough about me. This is for [y]ou.
More on Me Here
e-mail me

 Subscribe in a reader

What should i Link to?

Archives

Monday, April 28, 2008
The Shack

Back around Christmas, some friends from out West (Sarah Baldwin at George Fox University) highly recommended a new book called The Shack. Written by William P. Young, (I think a Northwesterner himself), the book was sweeping the countryside and picking up some glowing recommendations from the likes of Eugene Peterson and other notable witnesses. In fact, Peterson references the book as holding the potential to do for present generations what the celebrated Pilgrim's Progress did for its own generation. Needless to say they got my attention, but life happened and I never got around to ordering the book.

Enter one of my Worship Design Interns, MeMe McNairy, who burst into my office a few weeks ago with a book in her hand called The Shack. She gave me the book and exhorted me to read it. I did so, completing the book just the other day.

While I'm not ready to offer a review, I liked the book. Because I know many of you have not read it, I won't blow the story for you, but I would recommend you get it and read it. You should especially read it if you are giving leadership in ministry as many persons you serve will likely read it or be asking questions about it. Presently in its third or fourth printing, The Shack ranks in the top ten overall books selling at amazon.com. The novel unfolds a parable of sorts about an unthinkable tragedy, suffering and the nature of God as Trinity. Despite a tad of cheese factor from time to time, Young does a marvelous job of freighting some insightful Trinitarian theology in an amazingly understandable fashion. It will challenge your notion of God in both helpful and also uncomfortable ways.

Be warned, the heresy cops are out in full force against this book. I'm still working through their assessments and will offer a few links below for you to do the same. I don't want to react to them in the same way they have reacted to The Shack, but my sense is they have been quick to jump on some red herrings and may be missing the central thrust of the work. I do think the book takes a risk in over humanizing all of the persons of the Trinity though I am still wrestling with it. I liked the book and will recommend it. I don't find it at all like your average new age oriented "Embraced by the Light" or "20 minutes in Heaven," and the like.

You can read a quite thoughtful yet solidly reformed take on the book here.

Listen to Albert Mohler Jr. rate the book as "undiluted heresy" on his radio show.  

Watch Mark Driscoll's rant against the book in his usual fashion on youtube.

For a kinder, gentler take on The Shack check out internet monk who also adds a rant against the heresy police.

The author, William P. Young has a Shack blog here.

I'd be interested in any of your thoughts about The Shack if you've been able to read it yet. If you know of a solid Wesleyan-Arminian review of the book I'd like to read it.
posted by John David Walt | at 4/28/2008 10:31:00 PM | 3 comments

 


Worship Quote of the Week
This from the late Robert Webber--

If God is the object of worship, then worship must proceed from me, the
subject, to God, who is the object. . . . If God is understood, however,
as the personal God who acts as subject in the world and in worship rather
that the remote God who sits in the heavens, then worship is understood
not as the acts of adoration God demands of me but as the disclosure of
Jesus, who has done for me what I cannot do for myself. In this way
worship is the doing of God’s story within me so that I live in the
pattern of Jesus’s death and resurrection.

This is truly a massive paradigm changing statement that has the potential to radically change the way we design and lead worship. So what are the practical implications of a definition like this for our week to week practice of worship?
posted by John David Walt | at 4/28/2008 10:45:00 AM | 2 comments

 

Sunday, April 27, 2008
Human Sexuality and the APPROACHING STORM at the General Conference of the United Methodist Church
As the Methodists will be aware, the General Conference of the United Methodist Church now meets in Ft. Worth, Texas. The meeting began last week and will conclude at the end of this one. This is how the Church orders its policy and discipline every four years. As always, the storm brews over human sexuality and the legitimate boundaries for Christian practice. Below appears the major change in the works.

The PRESENT LANGUAGE approved in the "Social Principles" by the 2004 General Conference.

We recognize that sexuality is God's good gift to all persons. We believe persons may be fully human only when that gift is acknowledged and affirmed by themselves, the church, and society. We call all persons to the disciplined, responsible fulfillment of themselves, others, and society in the stewardship of this gift. We also recognize our limited understanding of this complex gift and encourage the medical, theological, and social science disciplines to combine in a determined effort to understand human sexuality more completely. We call the Church to take the leadership role in bringing together these disciplines to address this most complex issue. Further, within the context of our understanding of this gift of God, we recognize that God challenges us to find responsible, committed, and loving forms of expression.

Although all persons are sexual beings whether or not they are married, sexual relations are only clearly affirmed in the marriage bond. Sex may become exploitative within as well as outside marriage. We reject all sexual expressions that damage or destroy the humanity God has given us as birthright, and we affirm only that sexual expression that enhances that same humanity. We believe that sexual relations where one or both partners are exploitative, abusive, or promiscuous are beyond the parameters of acceptable Christian behavior and are ultimately destructive to individuals, families, and the social order.

We deplore all forms of the commercialization and exploitation of sex, with their consequent cheapening and degradation of human personality. We call for strict global enforcement of laws prohibiting the sexual exploitation or use of children by adults and encourage efforts to hold perpetrators legally and financially responsible. We call for the establishment of adequate protective services, guidance, and counseling opportunities for children thus abused. We insist that all persons, regardless of age, gender, marital status, or sexual orientation, are entitled to have their human and civil rights ensured.

We recognize the continuing need for full, positive, age-appropriate and factual sex education opportunities for children, young people, and adults. The Church offers a unique opportunity to give quality guidance and education in this area.

Homosexual persons no less than heterosexual persons are individuals of sacred worth. All persons need the ministry and guidance of the church in their struggles for human fulfillment, as well as the spiritual and emotional care of a fellowship that enables reconciling relationships with God, with others, and with self. The United Methodist Church does not condone the practice of homosexuality and consider this practice incompatible with Christian teaching. We affirm that God's grace is available to all, and we will seek to live together in Christian community. We implore families and churches not to reject or condemn lesbian and gay members and friends. We commit ourselves to be in ministry for and with all persons."


The PROPOSED LANGUAGE, which passed committee, for the 2008 "Social Principles."

We recognize that sexuality is God's good gift to all persons. We believe persons may be fully human only when that gift is acknowledged and affirmed by themselves, the church, and society. We call all persons to the disciplined, responsible fulfillment of themselves, others, and society in the stewardship of this gift. We also recognize our limited understanding of this complex gift and encourage the medical, theological, and social science disciplines to combine in a determined effort to understand human sexuality more completely. United Methodists, along with other Christians, have struggled to find principles for applying traditional teachings to contemporary understandings of human sexuality.

We recognize that sexuality is part of the larger human mystery, to be received and acknowledged in grateful responsibility. We reject all sexual expressions that damage or destroy the humanity God has given us. We deplore all forms of the commercialization and exploitation of sexual relations, with their consequent cheapening and degradation of human personality. We call for strict global enforcement of laws prohibiting the sexual exploitation or use of children by adults and encourage efforts to hold perpetrators legally and responsible. We call for adequate protection, guidance, and counseling for children thus abused. We believe that the Church family should support all families in providing age-appropriate education regarding sexuality to children, youth, and adults. We challenge all members of our community of faith to commitment, integrity, and fidelity in their sexual relationships.

We know that all are God's children and of sacred worth; yet we have been, and remain, divided regarding homosexual expressions of human sexuality. Faithful, thoughtful people who have grappled with this issue deeply disagree with one another; yet all seek a faithful witness. We continue to reason and pray together with faith and hope that the Holy Spirit will soon bring reconciliation to our community of faith. The fire in our disagreements points to a deeper human mystery than we knew. We believe that the Spirit has brought our collective conscience to acknowledge this mystery more honestly, and to make our claims with greater humility before God and our neighbors. We therefore ask the Church , United Methodist and others, and the world, to refrain from judgment regarding homosexual persons and practices until the Spirit leads us to a new insight. In the meantime, let us seek to welcome, know, forgive, and love one another as Christ has accepted us, that God may be glorified through everything in our lives.


The conservative coalition clearly lost on this front in the committee. The vote from the full session will likely come on Tuesday. Thoughts on the proposed changes? Analysis on the strategy here?
posted by John David Walt | at 4/27/2008 08:42:00 PM | 13 comments

 

Tuesday, April 22, 2008
PALM SUNDAY fistacufs in Holy City

As you may be aware, Easter is celebrated on a different calendar for the Orthodox Church among others. Apparently, last Sunday was Palm Sunday. Only this year, at the holiest site on the planet-- the Church of the Holy Sepluchre-- the site of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the celebration the palms clinched up as fists and became a brawl. Check out this headline.

JERUSALEM — Dozens of Greek and Armenian priests and worshippers exchanged blows in Christianity's holiest shrine on Palm Sunday, and pummeled police with palm fronds when they tried to break up the brawl.

Read the full story and even see pictures here.
posted by John David Walt | at 4/22/2008 03:15:00 PM | 7 comments

 

Saturday, April 19, 2008
The Room
This is a room we visit.
But you have gotten comfortable and that's alright.
It seems natural for people like us to wait here
in the dark. After all, dark is what we know:
the color of our ink,
the black glow of night;
it's where we write these poems.
Everyone must live here for a while,
but not always.
Your eyes have been watching out the window,
gleaning out the wandering color, waiting
for the twilight to sink back and reveal the tank
of blue stars, the soundless arena.
You've let the weightless dark spin around
your feet for too long. You still wait.
If they don't like your poems, so what?
Your work is like that clouded moon outside--
not fully alive, but beaming.

This one is from my friend and poet-mentor, David Harrity's collection called Morning and What has Come Since. The poem captures me these days.
posted by John David Walt | at 4/19/2008 05:08:00 PM | 0 comments

 

Friday, April 18, 2008
Why Pray?
This morning, in previewing the activity my new "best bloggers" feed list, I enjoyed the stimulating post of my new blogging sensei, Michael Spencer, a.k.a. the Internet Monk. (a.k.a. IM) Michael, if you are reading I could use a better title for this post. You can read his fairly provocative post at the above link. The following excerpt captures the problem.


It seems to me that a lot of evangelicals have a religious experience that basically amounts to a kind of protection racket; a Christianized version of paganism, where you beg the gods to keep bad things from happening to you and work out your problems.

Those prayer requests are full to overflowing with directions to God to stop the bad that hasn’t happened and solve the results of the bad that has.


IM then goes on to discuss this in relationship to the sovereignty of God, the purpose of miracles and the real essence of prayer.

In my own pastoral experience I've witnessed the lazy, sloppy tendency to vacillate to one of two easy answers: 1. Prayer changes things. (i.e. my prayers are instrumental and essential) or 2. Prayer changes me. (i.e. God is sovereign). Something about his post stirred me to remember this word from Thomas Merton:
"Prayer and meditation have an important part to play in opening up new ways and new horizons. If our prayer is the expression of a deep and grace-inspired desire for newness of life--and not the mere blind attachment to what has always been familiar and “safe”--God will act in us and through us to renew the Church by preparing, in prayer, what we cannot yet imagine or understand. In this way our payer and faith today will be oriented toward the future which we ourselves may never see fully realized on earth."
Thomas Merton, Contemplation in a world of Action.

I think Merton here identifies that nebulous and noumenal place somewhere between the easy poles of "prayer changes things" vs. "prayer changes me."

Perhaps real prayer designs to deliver us from this lever-like technological approach altogether and liberate us into a place that looks like identification with God. This is neither submission to the chaotic, cancerous reality of our broken world in the name of God's sovereignty nor projecting our own faith-solution oriented governance onto the situation in the claim of the power of prayer. Perhaps between these poles lives the truest dimension of intercession: identification with God in the troubled place twixt chaos and new creation. Prayer becomes not so much an instrumentality as the place of learning and pleading and so entering into this new reality. In this way, the school of prayer becomes the core curriculum of discipleship where we are communally apprenticed to Jesus in learning the way of the Cross, the mind of Christ and the inbreaking active realities of "on Earth as it is in Heaven."

Several years ago I published a short essay entitled, "To Pray or not to Pray," in a journal for seminarians. At the time if its writing, I think I was a bit more of a faith-idealist. My thinking today is both less simple and less sophisticated. All of this reminds me of that writing and particularly the following quote from the late Henri Nouwen:

“The word ‘prayer’ stands for a radical interruption of the vicious chain of interlocking dependencies leading to violence and war and for an entering into a totally new dwelling place. It points to a new way of speaking, a new way of breathing, a new way of being together, a new way of knowing, yes, a whole new way of living” (cf. Greer, The Only Necessary Thing: Living a Prayerful Life [Crossroad/Herder&Herder, 1999] 25).

Do not be afraid, little flock, for your Father has chosen gladly to give you the Kingdom. Luke 12:32.

J.D. Walt
posted by John David Walt | at 4/18/2008 07:32:00 AM | 3 comments

 

Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Read Better Blogs--Become a Better Blogger

This past Monday night we enjoyed a blogging seminar with one of the great Christian bloggers, Michael Spencer.  His blog, Internet Monk:  Dispatches from the post evangelical wilderness, is a must for your reader.  

One of my learnings from the night:  if you want to be a better blogger, read better blogs.  He encouraged us to study and learn from the good bloggers, both from their writing and their sense of blog artistry.  In response to his Monday night session with our Asbury Blogger's Society, he authored this post on the top ten bloggers we could study and learn from.  I have begun a "best bloggers" category in my Google Reader which has already become both an encouraging and challenging practice.  He also gave a nice link to our upstart Asbury Blogger's Society.  As a result we also got a nice link from Spencer's #1 Christian blogger, Australian, Andrew Jones at Tall Skinny Kiwi. All in all, it's been a fun day and a good break for our small society of bloggers.  Kudos to Chad Brooks and Isaac Hopper, two of our interns who have worked hard this year to move this project forward.    
posted by John David Walt | at 4/16/2008 09:17:00 PM | 2 comments

 

Tuesday, April 15, 2008
The Shout heard round the World. (i.e. American Idol goes Worship)

Today I received a stunning rebuke from my friend and mentor, Maxie Dunnam, concerning my American Idol post last week. Yo dogs. Check this out. He rebuked some of you too. Gotta love Maxie.

Dear J.D....Don't think I don't read your blog, but my friend

You strained at a knat and swallowed a camel in your blog about AI.
Interestingly, the responses you got so far pick up on your cynicism, and
join you in it. Isn't it an absurb stretch to compare this singing on AI
to having a stripper read scripture? You are over-sophisticating your
response to reach an over-sophisticated audience. Don't you think that
the value of "shouting aloud to the Lord", maybe by people who don't know
what it means to sound and look "holy" , has a value to the millions of
people who heard it? Don't you think just the mention of the name Jesus on
such a venue got the attention of folks who have not heard his name in a
long time. If we don't call his name "even the stones will cry out"
Could this be the stones crying? Don't you think the value of this coming
in this venue far exceeds the cynical response of a few people like you
compared to the possibility of a positive response from some of the
millions who heard it?

I have to say, also, that most of the responses I read sound rather
contrived.., wanting to respond positively to someone they respect so
much..Omar for instance and his "swaying" reference...and the guy who
thought somebody may be trying to reach and get money from the evangelical
wing of the audience. And as it relates to who they might have been
singing to...it didn't look and sound too different than what I experience
in much of the worship where songs like these are the mainstays.

KEEP BLOGGING, BUT BE CARFEFUL ABOUT SUCH SWEEPING DECLARATIONS
Ouch Elliot! How about that? Any rebuttals?

I did find quite interesting this string of posts from Josh Harris, who has some inside scoop on Fox's production room. It's quite fascinating. Read his earlier two posts as well-- esp the one from Huffington.

I also appreciated Bob Kauflin's treatment of the issue on his blog, Worship Matters.
posted by John David Walt | at 4/15/2008 02:01:00 PM | 16 comments

 

Friday, April 11, 2008
6 Reasons Why every pastor should blog
Check out this nice post by son of John Piper articulating why pastors should blog.

Here's the summary:

1. to Write
2. to Teach
3. to Recommend
4. to Interact
5. to Develop an Eye for what is Meaningful
6. to be Known
posted by John David Walt | at 4/11/2008 09:15:00 PM | 1 comments

 


American Idol tries a Shout to the Lord??
Was it me or was the American Idol finalists' group rendition of Shout to the Lord actually a bit strange? What was that all about? They took one of the most popular worship songs of the past ten years, a song explicitly aimed at Jesus Christ, and they sang it to people. It was a marvelous performance, but it seemed to lack any quality of worship whatsoever. What was that all about and how in the world did it happen? I'm sure some Christian on the production team fought really hard to make that happen and I commend them for the audacity to go for it in such a bold way, but it had more of the feel of a backstage chaplain getting strippers to read the Bible on stage during a performance. There's something right about it and yet it is completely unworkable. Anybody see it and see what I am trying to say? Or was it just me?

Here's a curiosity. They also sang the song as the close of Wednesday night's show only they omitted the name of Jesus from the song lyrics. Then they opened Thursday's show with the song and Jesus was named. This definitely points to some production room battles.

On a related note-- the Idol gives back dimension of the show where they probably raised 200 million dollars to help impoverished children around the world--- now there was the true worship-- the real shout to the Lord.

Take a look:

posted by John David Walt | at 4/11/2008 05:16:00 AM | 10 comments

 

Wednesday, April 09, 2008
Why don't people pray like this anymore?
The opening prayer in our Asbury Theological Seminary Spring Reader for today stunned me.  I am coining a new term for what this way of praying evokes in me-- theomotional.  Get it-- it's theological and yet it is emotional.  It is from Catherine of Sienna.  

Check this out:

Dear Lord, it seems that you are so madly in love with your creatures that you could not live without us. So you created us; and then, when we turned away from you, you redeemed us. Yet you are God, and so have no need of us. Your greatness is made no greater by our creation; your power is made no stronger by our redemption. You have no duty to care for us, no debt to repay us. It is love, and love alone, which moves you. —Catherine of Siena, 1347-1380

Who is praying like this in our day?  Wow!

Get involved with this Reader if you haven't already.  It's a Kingdom Treasure Trove.  
posted by John David Walt | at 4/09/2008 12:07:00 AM | 4 comments

 

Friday, April 04, 2008
almost inspired
Blogging is one of my enjoyments--- and yet I seem to have fallen off the planet of late. I can't seem to move it ahead. It's been a full month since my last post-- a new record for FARMStrong.  Very sad.  Is anybody still out there?  

Last night, I was looking at one of Seth Godin's book sites, The Dip, when I found this YouTube clip from a British form of American Idol. This inspires.

posted by John David Walt | at 4/04/2008 07:10:00 PM | 11 comments

 

Today...